International Codes of Practice on equine disease for 2023

Article by Victoria Colgate and Richard Newton

Horses are one of the most internationally travelled species, second only after humans, and this mobility, both between and within countries, means that the spread of equine infectious diseases is a very real and ever-present threat.

Indeed, infectious disease outbreaks are often related to new arrivals at, or movement of animals on and off premises, such as to competitions and race meetings. As well as having a negative impact on horse health and welfare, disease outbreaks can have further reaching consequences in terms of treatment costs, economic losses due to movement restrictions and an inability to compete, as well as disruption to the breeding schedule, which may have effects in racing in future years. Additionally, restrictions imposed in the face of the diagnosis of certain diseases can prevent the free export of horses between countries, impacting trade and equestrian sport. Infectious diseases are truly trans-boundary, and such a problem necessitates global cooperation and communication, echoing the mantra that ‘prevention is better than cure’. 

The origins and evolution of the Codes of Practice

figure 1

In 1977 in Newmarket, UK, there was widespread development of vulval discharge in thoroughbred mares post-covering that adversely affected their fertility and to an extent that caused temporary closure of stallion barns and stud farms. Initially unknown, the cause of this outbreak was later identified as the bacterium Tayorella equigenitalis, the causative agent of contagious equine metritis (CEM) and often referred to as the CEM organism, or CEMO. 

The impact on the 1977 breeding season was significant enough for the Horserace Betting Levy Board (HBLB) to consider a serious need to control CEM in future years and in reaction to this, the Codes of Practice (CoP) were created. First developed by HBLB committee discussion in the summer of 1977 and then formally published in 1978, the HBLB CoP outlined swabbing protocols in the weeks prior to covering in an attempt to prevent the venereal transmission of CEM. 

Despite the perceived draconian nature of these first codes, compliance was high and overall were highly successful—with CEM cases drastically falling following their introduction. In subsequent years, the CEM CoP was extended to include control measures on reproductive disease caused by the other venereal bacterial pathogens: Klebsiella pneumoniae (capsule types 1, 2 and 5) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Codes on the prevention and management of equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) and equine viral arteritis (EVA) were also added following disease outbreaks of significant concern to the thoroughbred breeding industry in subsequent years. 

Today the CoP are referred to as the ‘HBLB International Codes of Practice’, with the 2020 CoP being the inaugural internationally branded edition and representing a comprehensive manual outlining a series of voluntary standards (codes) and advisories (guidelines), with accompanying appendices. They are intended to assist breeders, trainers and horse owners (in collaboration with their veterinary surgeons) to control and prevent a range of important infectious diseases in equids. The CoP have a broad application among thoroughbred breeders; and the UK, Ireland, France, Germany and Italy are all signatories. Additionally, in a translated form, they have formed the basis of written equine infectious disease advice in many other countries. The initial reduction and then sustained maintenance of low levels of infectious disease outbreaks experienced after the CoP’s introduction is testament to the document’s effectiveness and importance.  

The HBLB International Codes of Practice for the 2023 breeding season

The CoP are reviewed annually by a group of international veterinary breeding and infectious disease experts and stakeholder representatives. This review ensures that all advice is as current as possible regarding the latest scientific evidence and global disease situation. The CoP convey practical recommendations gained considering recent experiences with the occurrence and control of relevant outbreaks. 

The 2023 edition of ‘The CoP Manual’ (title cover, above Fig 1 and table of contents, below Fig 2) comprises:

figure 2

• Six Codes on the following diseases: CEM (covering CEMO, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), EVA, EHV-1, equine coital exanthema (ECE, caused by EHV-3), equine infectious anaemia (EIA) and dourine 

• Five Guidelines on equine influenza (EI), piroplasmosis, strangles, West Nile Fever (WNF) and artificial insemination (AI) 

• Eleven Appendices with a range of  supporting information and guidance 

The CoP are published on the HBLB website (https://codes.hblb.org.uk/); a PDF download  (https://codes.hblb.org.uk/downloads/2023/Codes%20of%20Practice%202023.pdf) is also available. In Great Britain, the Thoroughbred Breeders Association (TBA) produces a spiral-bound printed hard copy for its members. 

The CoP outline each disease sequentially, using a standardised format of sections which include information on notification procedures, clinical signs, transmission, prevention, diagnosis, control, treatment, freedom from disease and export requirements. It is a document that continues to evolve over time in terms of both the diseases included and the expert advice imparted. 

Why ‘codes’ and ‘guidelines’?

Although the logic behind the distinction as to why specific diseases in the CoP are covered by a guideline rather than a code is not necessarily immediately initiative. It is worth remembering that a Code of Practice may be defined as ‘A documented set of recommended or preferred processes, actions or organisational structures to be applied in a given setting’, whereas a guideline is: ‘A general rule, principle or piece of advice’.  Therefore, the diseases applied as codes are those that directly relate to, and have an impact on, breeding and that necessitate particular actions either to prevent or control disease, should they occur. The guidelines, in contrast, are merely advisory measures to those involved in thoroughbred breeding businesses, but cover diseases and practices that are also highly applicable to other populations of horses. The remainder of the article outlines several of the important codes and guidelines.

Strangles

Strangles, caused by the bacterium Streptococcus equi, is a disease affecting the lymph nodes of the upper respiratory tract. Although endemic within the UK horse population, it only occasionally affects thoroughbred stud farms. Accordingly, it was first included in the CoP as an advisory guideline in 2004 and has since been periodically updated in line with developments in diagnostic testing and vaccination. Due to the ability of Streptococcus equi to develop persistent infection, remaining within material (pus/chondroids) in the guttural pouches long after resolution of clinical signs, one of the key elements in prevention and control is identification and treatment of these carrier animals. This involves performing guttural pouch endoscopy and lavage of strangles cases around 30 days after clinical recovery from infection, and also of any new arrivals at a premises during the quarantine period, before they are allowed to mix with the resident herd. 

Equine infectious anaemia (EIA)

figure 3

EIA, also known as swamp fever, is caused by the equine infectious anaemia virus (EIAV) and is transmitted between horses by the transfer of infected blood, either by insect vectors or contaminated veterinary equipment or through administration of infected blood products (e.g., plasma or whole blood transfusion). It is found in thoroughbred and non-thoroughbred populations worldwide, including parts of mainland Europe; but it is currently not present in Great Britain, where any suspicion of disease is notifiable by law to the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) and would result in compulsory slaughter of the affected animal. Following an outbreak in Ireland in 2006, a CoP for EIA was developed by Defra in the UK in August that year and was included as an addendum for the 2007 breeding season (Figure 3) and subsequently as a full code from 2008 onwards. EIA has been included as a full CoP since 2008, and it recommends pre-breeding testing of all mares and stallions prior to commencement of the covering season as the best way to establish and maintain freedom from infection. 

Dourine 

A new code on dourine was added in 2012, following its re-identification in Sicily and the Italian mainland during 2011, which necessitated pre-import screening of horses arriving from this area. A notifiable venereal disease caused by the protozoan parasite Trypansoma equiperdum, once widespread, had largely undergone eradication and of late had only been reported in Asia, Africa, South America, Eastern Europe, Mexico and Russia. There is no cure for dourine, and euthanasia is usually the advised treatment option on the grounds of animal welfare and population health. As investigations into the 2011 Italian outbreak indicated subclinical seropositivity to dourine in many regions of Italy, it was evident that the disease was closer to our shores than anticipated. That led to its addition to the CoP in order to keep all owners/breeders informed and appropriately advised. 

Equine influenza (EI)

EI was added to the CoP in 2020 as an advisory guideline following the 2019 European epidemic, which saw a major outbreak in the UK (Figure 4), including cases of clinical disease in vaccinated thoroughbreds. This led to the cancellation of British horseracing for six days in February 2019 as a pre-emptive control measure, but still at significant economic cost to the industry. 

Figure 4

Although clinical EI is usually fairly mild and self-limiting, the resulting damage to the respiratory epithelium can impact performance for up to six months and leaves the horse vulnerable to secondary bacterial infections and potential pneumonia. Appropriate vaccination, biosecurity protocols and effective quarantining of new arrivals are outlined in the Code as the cornerstone to EI control. With such a highly contagious virus capable of spreading over large distances and with great speed, especially in the immunologically naïve, awareness and prevention are key.

West Nile fever (WNF)

WNF, caused by West Nile virus (WNV), is an infectious but non-contagious disease transmitted through the bite of an infected mosquito. Although the natural host-vector cycle is between birds and mosquitoes, horses and indeed humans can become infected but act as so-called incidental or ‘dead-end’ hosts; importantly, not presenting is a risk for onward transmission as there is insufficient WNV in their bloodstream. Many horses infected with WNV remain without signs, but approximately 10% will develop neurological disease, which can be fatal. Historically confined to Africa and the East, it entered North America in 1999 leading to widespread infection with many equine and human fatalities. Since then it has become endemic in the USA and continues to spread further into northern Europe as climate change alters vector habitats and life cycles. After the development of equine cases in Germany in 2018 and evidence of human and bird cases in the Netherlands in 2020, WNV was considered to pose an increasing threat to the UK horse population, especially animals that travelled overseas for competition and breeding purposes. WNF was therefore added as a guideline to the CoP in 2021. 

Piroplasmosis

The latest disease addition to the CoP was an advisory guideline on piroplasmosis in 2022, following concern that the disease was becoming increasingly important among the international equine population. Piroplasmosis is a tick-borne disease caused by the intracellular parasites Babesia caballi and Theileria equi. Although the UK is currently considered to be free from locally acquired endemic disease (referred to as ‘autochthonous’), cases have occasionally been confirmed in the UK and are endemic in other European countries. With no formal requirements for pre-import screening, infection could re-enter the UK through importation of infected horses. The code gives informative background information to raise awareness among thoroughbred breeders and owners/keepers of other horse populations.  

Improving accessibility and applicability of the CoP

Another way in which the CoP have more recently evolved is through the mechanisms of delivery to stakeholders. In July 2016, the accessibility and reach of the CoP took a further leap with the generation of the smartphone EquiBioSafe app (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.veterinaryadvances.android.equibiosafe&hl=en_GB&gl=US&pli=1). With the HBLB Codes of Practice and National Trainers Federation Codes of Practice précised into key elements for the control and prevention of infectious diseases, the app allows interactive and stable-side access to advice, as well as assisting trainers to comply with sporting authority vaccine regulations and disease notification procedures. With the ability to send emergency notifications in the event of heightened disease threats in a particular area, the app provides real-time relevant information to assist with implementation of proactive biosecurity measures. This helps safeguard horse health and the socioeconomic livelihoods of all those involved in equestrian sport. Like the CoP, the EquiBiosafe app has mainly been targeted to a European audience, but downloads recorded from North America, Asia and Latin America demonstrate its international application. 

The HBLB International Codes of Practice act as broad, minimum requirement recommendations for the identification, treatment, prevention and control of a range of important equine infectious diseases—equally relevant across international borders and from pleasure to elite competition horses. They are also dynamic, evolving over time in line with the ever-changing disease situation, and therefore acting as a vital education and reference resource to all those involved in the equestrian industry. They form a user-friendly instruction manual of exactly ‘how (not) to’ allow infectious diseases to fulfil their devastating potential.  

How will new HISA regulations affect Europeans sending horses to the US this autumn?

Article by Annie Lambert

Breeders’ Cup contestants travelling to Kentucky this fall will have more to worry about than flight delays and shipping reservations. Owners, trainers and jockeys will need to bone up on new racing regulations now enforced across America. It appears they are well into that task.

The new rules and regulations became United States federal law in December 2020. The Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (HISA) is responsible for drafting and enforcing safety and integrity rules in thoroughbred racing across the U.S. Overseen by the government’s Federal Trade Commission (FTC), HISA is implementing a national, uniform set of rules applicable to all thoroughbred racing participants and racetrack facilities.

HISA comprises the Racetrack Safety Program, which went into effect 1 July 2022, as well as the Anti-Doping and Medication Control (ADMC) program, which will be implemented in January 2023. The ADMC will impact next year’s Breeders’ Cup.

According to Lisa Lazarus, chief executive officer of HISA, the Racetrack Safety Program includes operational safety rules and national racetrack accreditation standards, seeking to enhance equine welfare and minimise horse and jockey injuries. This program expands veterinary oversight and imposes track surface maintenance and testing requirements. It also enhances jockey (and exercise rider) safety, regulates riding crop use and implements voided claim rules, in addition to other measures.

The ADMC program will create a centralised testing and results management process while applying uniform penalties for integrity violations across the country. The rules and enforcement protocols will be administered by a new independent agency, the Horseracing Integrity and Welfare Unit (HIWU), which was established by Drug Free Sport International (DFS).

HIWU will oversee testing, educate stakeholders on the new system, accredit laboratories, investigate potential integrity violations and prosecute those breaking rules and protocols.

HISA completed and pending rules and regulations can be found at https://www.hisaus.org/.

Shifting protocols

Not everyone required to opt into the Horseracing Integrity & Safety Act is pleased to oblige. The confusing regulations have left many with less than a clear understanding of what the new rules actually mean. Those details have constantly been modified and most likely will continue to fluctuate as flaws in the statute are arbitrated. 

The legislation timeline—a very rapid implementation—did not leave an abundance of time for the busy and independent members of the racing community to thoroughly digest the new rules and oversights: In a hurry, they are being asked/required to become obligated by registering themselves and their horses. Horsemen felt left in the dust.

HISA is now, however, in the process of adding a means for horsemen to have a bigger voice in forming regulations and protocols—a complaint horsemen have had since the onset is being excluded from the process. Lazarus announced her executive team would be selecting 10–12 horsemen to participate on the Horsemen’s Advisory Group.

Barry Irwin, founder and chief executive officer of Team Valor International, has been promoting additional integrity in the racing industry for two decades or longer. As a turf writer, breeder, owner and bloodstock agent for over 50 years, Irwin looks forward to implementation of the ADMC. He might have hoped for a smoother execution of HISA, but he is glad things are progressing.

“The safety element is so big and all encompassing, some people may think overreaching, that it stalled the implementation of the integrity piece,” Irwin opined. “There is a lot of good in it; there is a lot of confusion in it. Part of the confusion stems from the perceived lack of input and influence of the people to whom these rules apply.

“A lot of trainers are [unhappy] because there are a bunch of [changed] procedures that they have been using for years, such as blistering horses, pin-firing horses—things like that. There are growing pains, so they have invited horsemen to join an advisory committee for input now and in the future, which I found to be a good thing. It’s just a little late.”  

People responsible for registering horses, usually the trainer, are required to keep precise records for each animal. Most horsemen have a vivid aversion to bookkeeping; they’d much rather concentrate on training horses and keeping owners happy and informed.

Most countries require medical and procedural records be kept on their equine competitors. HISA also requires trainers and veterinarians to maintain detailed, daily health and treatment records for equines in their care. This also applies to international trainers temporarily in town for major races. Those records must be made available to regulatory veterinarians, stewards and HISA upon request. Imagine the daily hours to keep up with a barn full of trainees. There is a solution—a software program—to ease the struggle.

Solution for keeping records

Equine MediRecord became operational in 2018. It was the brainstorm of Pierce Dargan in County Kildare, Ireland. Dargan, a fifth generation horseman, is the company’s CEO. Dargan’s system was created for his family’s training operation in Ireland, to help keep current with racing regulations they faced at the time. 

Trainers can sign up for Dargan’s company platform, which allows them to keep the tedious records required by HISA. Those with multiple stables and facilities can add assistant trainers and veterinarians to assist with inputting information.

“What our system then does is notify the trainer when a record has been put in by someone else for them to sign off, ensuring they know at all times what is being given to their horses,” Dargan explained. “Any horse with an open treatment on our system will [be marked] to remind the trainer to check this horse before entering into any races, as there is still a treatment in the horse’s profile; this ensures the withdrawal period is completed before they race.”

Presently, the cost is $1.50 per horse, per month for the initial year, increasing to $3.00 per horse/month the second year. “We wanted to make sure this was a tool that all trainers, big and small, could afford,” Dargan said. “One of the benefits of having clients globally is we can spread the costs, making it cheaper for all.”

 “We have done the Breeders’ Cup World Championships for the last two years, as well as the Pegasus World Cup, Saudi Cup and Preakness in 2022,” Dargan pointed out.                    

Coming to America

International Breeders’ Cup entries and connections appear prepared to take on HISA, although there could be a few speed bumps on the road to America.

Not registering for HISA—no matter what continent you hail from—means a person or horse may not participate in U.S. racing. Once signed up, however, being misinformed or not following the rules can land people and equines severe punishments, large monetary fines and/or disqualification from industry participation.

Early in the process, HISA’s website was not particularly user friendly, but those issues have been worked out for the most part. International connections preparing to run in major U.S. races initially registered with HISA prior to entering or declaring to run. However, to register for HISA, one needs to be licensed in the state where they will be running. Some states, like New York, require digital fingerprinting of the licensee by track personnel, causing problems for horsemen in far away corners of the world.
“HISA has made it impossible to do things on race day,” explained Adrian Beaumont, director of Racecourse Services for the International Racing Bureau in Newmarket, England. “Therefore, we had to be proactive and get connections licensed beforehand. This often means having to get connections fingerprinted in advance of the meeting. This was especially true of connections, like owners, who would not be going to the races but still needed a HISA registration. New York Racing Association made their cut-off time for HISA as 10 a.m., scratch time, on the day of the race.”

According to Beaumont, HISA’s Lisa Lazarus organised a Zoom call, for Breeders’ Cup principles, including Japan, on 16 September. “I will be interested to know the timeframe they will require all HISA registrations to be completed by, especially as declarations to run are due on Monday, October 31,” added Beaumont.

While the Lazarus Zoom call may flatten some organisational speed bumps, the initial dismay for HISA created a flurry of ongoing legal actions by several state racing commissions, jockey organisations, different Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective associations and other groups. North American Trainer magazine contributor and equine attorney Peter J. Sacopulos expressed the issue in the magazine’s Issue #65 - Summer 2022, on page 48. In the article, Sacopulos questions how HISA affects international trainers and owners.

“In registering, the foreign national trainer is responsible for and obligated to fully and completely understand and comply with all HISA requirements. Once properly registered and deemed a ‘covered person,’ the foreign national trainer has certain ongoing obligations. For example, Thoroughbred trainers are required to complete four (4) hours of training annually pursuant to Section 2182(b)(5) of the rules governing the Racetrack Safety Program. Additionally, there are requirements for filing records relative to the medical care and treatment of horses. Also, the licensing and ongoing requirements for covered persons apply to owners of Thoroughbred horses. Therefore, it is recommended that the Thoroughbred trainer who is going through the registration process informs his or her owner of those requirements and sees that the owner(s) are properly registered as covered persons.”

It gets complicated.

Riders, whips, rules & penalties 

Beaumont was somewhat surprised by the requirement for jockeys to have an annual baseline concussion test as part of the HISA registration. Riders in England and Ireland have concussion baselines done every two years. French jockeys are not required to have annual baseline concussion tests.

The chief medical officers at the main European Jockey Clubs and the Jockeys’ Associations are now aware of this test requirement. Beaumont recommended their website as informative and helpful. 

https://jockeyclub.com/pdfs/HISA/HISA_Jockey.pdf

“It is the jockeys [who] require the extra briefing about all the rules,” Beaumont said, “but we will do that with them all before race day. “At the last two Breeders’ Cups, the stewards have also briefed all the jockeys about their rules on the mornings of the races. This will obviously now include any extra regulations brought in by HISA.”

Jockeys with Breeders’ Cup mounts will need to study HISA restrictions for use of the whip, which in some cases are similar to, yet vary from, European rules.

Until the limitations on use of the whip become muscle memory, riders are finding themselves punished for extra strikes or improper handling of the whip. Numerous penalties have been dished out to even the best of the American riding colony thus far. One costly example occurred last month.

Jockey Luis Rodriguez-Castro was fined $500 and suspended three days for his ride on Drafted (Field Commission) while finishing fifth in the Forego (Gr. 1) at Saratoga in New York. The rider’s violation was striking Drafted with the whip ten times during the race. HISA rules allow only six strikes during a race; Rodriguez-Castro’s four strike overage cost the horse’s connections $26,000 in purse money.

But Germany and other European nations are also inflicting stringent rules on riders who are overly aggressive with crop use. 

German-bred Torquator Tasso, winner of last year’s Qatar Prix de l'Arc de Triomphe (Gp. 1), finished a near second to Mendocino in Baden-Baden, Germany. Jockey Frankie Dettori felt the sting of striking his mount one time too many with a 14-day suspension.

Strict German whip rules permit for the crop to be used only five times during a race, with the use of it down the shoulder with hands on the reins still considered as one strike.

Team Valor International races horses in Germany, and Barry Irwin voiced respect for their programs in general and regard for their accomplishments with smaller thoroughbred crops of 750 to 800 foals; Torquator Tasso is an example.

“[Germany] has a lot of rules, and they are different from England, Ireland and France,” Irwin said. “You can’t use a tongue tie, for example. I don’t know any other jurisdiction that does that. They are very good at testing, and they have a lot of rules about bleeders.”

Handling and properly holding the whip have become strict and exacting in many racing nations. A BHA steering group has proposed 20 changes to their current whip rules in four areas—how the whip is used, changes to regulation, changes to enforcement, plus other recommendations. (See sidebar)

“Most of our jurisdictions are run as tightly, if not more tightly, than your new HISA rules over in the states,” Beaumont pointed out. In some countries, such as Denmark, Norway and Sweden, whips are banned. Most other countries have strict rules on the use of the whip in terms of how many times a horse can be hit and where they can be hit.”

“The new rules, which are likely to come into force with BHA, include using [the whip] in the backhand position only,” he added. “There are examples every week of jockeys getting fined and banned for use of the whip, and generally longer suspensions than in the states.”

Nation-to-nation compatibility?

HISA regulations overall are not so dissimilar from other international edicts. There are so many variables, geographically for one, that synchronising worldwide regulations may never come to fruition. But, it’s a thought for the future.

When the ADMC portion of HISA kicks into gear the first of next year, there will likely be even more details to be digested by horsemen and other stakeholders. After all, that was the initial consideration when seeking reforms.

Irwin has “great hope” that those marring the integrity of thoroughbred racing will be prosecuted and severely penalised, and that the punishments will be severe enough to stop the cheating.

“As for the Anti-Doping and Medication Control regulations for 2023, I await their details,” said Beaumont. “Of course, we are already subject to strict restrictions over here, so this should not be an issue. Every horse shipping to run at Breeders’ Cup, for example, will already have done an out-of-competition test sanctioned by the state governing body and carried out by the likes of BHA on their behalf.

“They have a tough task,” Irwin said of HISA. “There are so many elements, groups to try to appeal to—it is a tough job.”

HOW THE WHIP SHOULD BE USED

1. Use of the whip for safety purposes should continue to be a fundamental principle of regulation.

2. The Rule requiring the whip to be carried (though not necessarily used) should be retained.

3. Use of the ProCush whip should continue to be permitted for encouragement, with strong and appropriate regulation for its use.

4. The whip rules will be amended to restrict use for encouragement to the backhand position only.

5. Harmonisation of whip rules and penalties is a positive aspiration. The BHA should continue to play a leading role in discussions about harmonisation with its international counterparts, particularly Ireland and France.

CHANGES TO REGULATION

1. The regulatory approach to the whip should be reframed to drive continuous improvement, both in standards of whip use and in the consistency of stewarding.

2. Official guidance notes relating to some aspects of the whip rules should be refined and improved, so they are less ambiguous and open to interpretation, and to ensure greater consistency in the enforcement of the rules.

3. A review panel will be established, which will assess all potential whip offences and apply sanctions or remedial actions where appropriate. The panel will deal with referrals from the Stewards, as well as having the power to initiate its own review.

CHANGES TO ENFORCEMENT

1. The threshold for the application of some whip penalties will be lowered, to increase the deterrent effect and ensure earlier intervention.

2. Penalties will be increased for some specific offences where the current penalty is considered inadequate.

3. Financial penalties applied to amateur riders for whip offences will be increased.

4. The penalty structure for use of the whip above the permitted level, which are the most frequently committed offences, will be revised to increase the deterrent effect.

5. Penalty structure for use of the whip above the permitted level in major races to be revised as a doubling of the suspensions for the same offence in standard races.

6. Repeat whip offences should be addressed at an earlier stage, and the penalties for repeat offences increased to deter further repetition.

7. Disqualification of the horse will be introduced into the penalty framework for particularly serious use of the whip above the permitted level, where there has been a clear and flagrant disregard for the rules.

OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS

1. The BHA, on behalf of the racing industry, should commission and support further objective research into the effects of the whip, using any relevant scientific advances to inform policy.

2. The BHA should regularly consider the design and specifications of the approved whip, with a view to incorporating any technological innovations or advances that could further improve equine welfare and safety.

3. Reasonable efforts should be made by British racing to explain the design, use and regulation of the whip to key audiences.

4. While changing the name of the whip is not a direct, formal proposal, racing participants and media should be encouraged and supported to speak about the whip using appropriate and responsible language.

5. The BHA and racecourses should agree a standard rider contract for charity and legends races, to ensure riders in such races are clear on their obligations in relation to use of the whip.

The challenge of transport - the practical considerations for transporting horses

The after-effects of travel on racehorses has vexed trainers for decades. Short-distance transport of racehorses is, as every trainer knows, almost always of very little consequence. Longer distance transport presents a much greater challenge and months of work and planning can be undone in the course of a few hours.

Des Leadon (European Trainer - issue 24 - Winter 2008)