All tied up?

Tying-up or ER (exertional rhabdomyolysis) is a problem that every yard will encounter at some point in time with reports of 5-7% of the thoroughbred population being affected. ER is the general term used to cover two main forms of tying-up, acute or recurrent. ER by definition relates to the breakdown of striated muscle fibres following exercise. These fibres connect to the bone allowing movement of the skeleton. Damage causes anything from mild stiffness to the inability to move.  With much still unknown about the condition, the focus falls on reducing risk and ongoing management of those affected with recurrent form. The main area for intervention and management relates to feeds and feeding practices, an area that can be directly controlled by the yard and adjusted as needed for the individuals most affected.  Acute Exertional Rhabdomyolysis     The acute form is typically caused through factors external to the muscle rather than their being an intrinsic muscle defect.     Most commonly seen when the horse is adapting to a new level of work and the intensity or duration is too strenuous. Where speed work is concerned, the most likely cause is a depletion of cellular high energy phosphates, the muscles’ energy supply, combined with lactic acidosis. Where endurance work is concerned, depletion of intracellular glycogen—the stored form of glucose often combined with over-heating and electrolyte imbalances—is the common cause.     The other key factor for an acute episode is dietary energy intake being excessive to the current level of work. The use of high starch feeds to supply energy for horses in training is a common practice with grains, traditionally oats, forming the basis of such feeds. In the early stages of fitness work, an over-supply of energy relative to need, particularly when starch forms a large part of the diet, is a risk factor.  Recurrent Exertional Rhabdomyolysis  This form of ER, where episodes are frequent and often seen even at low levels of exercise, has led to the suggestion that much like humans, there is an inherited intrinsic muscle defect. Such defects would predispose the horse to ER. Documented defects relevant to thoroughbreds include a disorder in muscle contractility or excitation contraction coupling, whereby muscle fibres become over-sensitive and normal function is disrupted.  Risk factors for ER in horses with the recurrent form include stress or high excitement during exercise, periods of jogging (10-30 minutes), infrequent exercise and over-feeding of energy in a high starch format relative to need.  Dietary Considerations for ER  The amount of energy fed and the type of energy fed are important considerations whether looking to avoid an acute feed related episode or considering the management of a horse with the recurrent form.  Other nutrients often talked about when managing ER include vitamin E, selenium and electrolytes. Historically the inclusion of vitamin E and selenium were considered important for the prevention of further episodes, however there is no evidence to support such use. A case of deficiency in either of these nutrients may well put the horse at a disadvantage and could perhaps create a state where occurrence is more notable; however, with the advent of fortified and balanced complete bagged feeds, such nutrients are normally supplied in more than adequate amounts. Their role as antioxidants which function to ‘mop-up’ damaging free radicals generated through training is where their use can benefit any horse at this level of work. The use of additional vitamin E is also recommended when increasing the fat content of the diet—a common practice when feeding horses with recurrent ER.  Electrolytes do play an important role in normal muscle function, and any deficiency noted in the diet should be corrected. Identifying a need in the diet is more easily done than determining if the individual horse has a problem with absorption or utilisation of the electrolytes. A urinary fractional excretion test (FE) will highlight issues, and subsequent correction through the diet to return the horse to within normal ranges may offer some improvement. However, it is important to note that for horses with recurrent ER, where an intrinsic muscle defect is present, the research to date has shown no electrolyte imbalances or differences between such horses and unaffected horses.  Quantifying ‘Low Starch and High fat’ Feeding  The recommended practice for management of ER is a reduction in starch and an increase in fats. This practice has two ways of benefiting the horse: a reduction in ‘spookiness’ or reactivity and a positive effect on muscle damage as seen by lower CK (creatine kinase) levels following exercise.  Positive effects on lowering CK levels were found when a higher proportion of the energy fed came from diets higher in fats and lower in non-structural carbohydrates (starches and sugars). The effect was noted when fed at 4.5kg/day—an amount easily reached and normally surpassed when feeding horses in training. The beneficial diet provided 20% of energy from fats and only 9% from starches and sugars compared to the more traditional sweet feed diet providing 45% of energy from starches and sugars and less than 5% from fats.  Finding Fats  Top dressing of oils will increase fat in the diet - with a normal intake of up to 100 mls per day. Although the horse can digest higher amounts, palatability usually restricts a higher intake. Pelleted or extruded fat sources are increasingly popular as alternatives to oils for their convenience of feeding and palatability. Straight rice bran and blends of materials such as rice bran, linseed and soya are available from most major feed companies. Oil content will typically range from 18-26% providing 180g-260g of oil per kilogram as fed.  Racing feeds will also provide oil in the diet; content is quite varied typically from 4-10% providing 40g-100g per kilogram as fed. Hay and haylage also contains oil at a low level, typically 2% providing just 20g per kilogram on a dry matter basis.  Choosing Carbohydrates  Traditional feeding based on oats and other whole grains will have a higher starch content than feeds using a combination of grains and fibres. Levels of starch found in complete feeds and straights have a broad range from as low as 8% in a complete feed, specifically formulated to have a low starch content, and up to in excess of 50% for straights such as barley and naked oats.  The level of tolerance a horse has for starch intake when suffering from recurrent ER is somewhat individual, but the general practice is to reduce the intake of starch as low as possible without compromising body condition or providing an insufficient amount of energy to maintain performance. Starch is a valuable carbohydrate needed to provide glucose—the primary muscle ‘fuel’ required during anaerobic exercise where the horse’s heart rate is elevated and the pathway for utilisation of fats is closed. For horses in training, a large part of the exercise programme is anaerobic and therefore starch is required in the diet.  There is no official value at which a feed goes from being a high-starch feed to a low-starch feed. That combined with a lack of information around starch levels for some products can often result in yards having feed programmes that are accidentally higher in starch than intended for their horses with ER. A common error is use of a pony feed or cool feed, which is assumed to be more suitable by description but may not be low in starch, only lower in protein than a racing feed.  Feed materials today are wide ranging and allow feed companies to create a variety of feeds around different nutritional parameters. It is possible to have a 14% protein feed with a starch content ranging anywhere from around 10% up to 35%. Protein content is completely independent of starch content and cannot be used as a predictor as to what extra level of starch your feed may provide. Obtaining that information from your feed provider is essential when making an informed decision about your feeding programme for horses with ER.  As the hard feed—whether straights or a complete feed—forms the largest part of the diet by weight for a racehorse, it is the most influential item when looking to regulate starch intake. When considering starch intake, the total intake needs to be calculated. The amount of starch in a feed is important, for example choosing a feed that is 10% starch is likely a good decision over a feed at 30% starch; but these are just numbers. How much is eaten of that feed in a day is important. Blending hard feeds with alternative energy sources such as beet-pulp, oils and alfalfa in the feeding programme dramatically lowers total starch intake. Through using a ‘low starch’ feed in combination with alternative fibre and oil energy sources, it is possible to create a very low total intake without compromising on energy.        Examples of the Different Feeding Programmes on Total Starch Intake  Example One – ‘High Starch’ Feeding     Feed    Bowls    Weight (kg)    Starch Intake (g)   Morning Feed  30% Starch Racing Feed  1.0  1.5  450  Lunch Feed  30% Starch Racing Feed  1.5  2.25  675  Evening Feed  30% Starch Racing Feed  2.0  3.0  900    Large Handful Alfalfa    0.5  10      Total   6.75    2,025      Example Two – ‘Moderate Starch’ Feeding     Feed    Bowls    Weight (kg)    Starch Intake (g)   Morning Feed  18% Starch Racing Feed  1.0  1.5  270  Lunch Feed  18% Starch Racing Feed  1.5  2.25  405  Evening Feed  18% Starch Racing Feed  2.0  3.0  540    Large Handful Alfalfa    0.5  10      Total   6.75    1,215      Example Three – ‘Low Starch’ Feeding     Feed    Bowls    Weight (kg)    Starch Intake (g)   Morning Feed  10% Starch Racing Feed  1.0  1.5  270  Lunch Feed  10% Starch Racing Feed  1.0  1.5  270    Small Handful Alfalfa    0.25  5  Evening Feed  10% Starch Racing Feed  1.5  2.25  405    Rice Bran    0.5  110    Beet Pulp (dry weight)    0.2  2    Large Handful Alfalfa    0.5  10      Total   6.7    950      Adjusting Feed to Workload  Regulating feed to match workload is another important factor in managing horses with recurrent ER. For days of rest or walking, only the ‘hard feed’ should ideally be halved in weight. This practice starts with the evening meal given on the day before rest and continues until the end of the rest day. To meet appetite and maintain condition, the fibre element of the diet needs to be increased to meet the gap left from feeding a reduced amount of hard feed. When soaked beet pulp and alfalfa or similar chaffs are included in the programme, these can easily be increased to in part replace the removed hard feed alongside an increased offering of hay or haylage. Oils can be fed as normal on a rest day.     Maintaining a Balance  Where the individual horse determines that hard feed intake must be significantly restricted in order to avoid further episodes, it is worth considering if the diet is now providing appropriate levels of key nutrients. Feeds are formulated to be effective between certain ranges based on normal intake for that category of work. In general horses fed typical feeding rates will be provided with levels above baseline, e.g., greater than 100% for many nutrients, particularly those where benefits arise from a higher level of supplementation such as vitamin E.  The examples below show the impact of a reduced hard feed intake. Whilst intake is considered sufficient in meeting the majority of nutrient requirements, the recurrent ER horse with a lower feeding rate is no longer receiving the same level of nutrition, including receiving lower levels of vitamin E and selenium which could be of benefit. In such cases, supplementing the diet through use of a vitamin and mineral balancer or specifically with individual nutrients concerned will ensure that the horse still receives a consistently high level of nutrition.  A total dietary intake assessment is provided by most major feed brands on request or through an independent registered nutritionist. Reviewing the diet as a whole will help identify where improvements can be made, especially for horses with specific dietary needs.     Normal Intake  6.75kg (15lbs) of typical racing feed  Free choice hay consumed at 1% of body weight        Kentucky Equine Research Recommended Daily Allowance   Reduced Intake  5.0kg (11lbs) of typical racing feed  Free choice hay consumed at 1% of body weight   Kentucky Equine Research Recommended Daily Allowance      Summary     Feeding is an important part of reducing risk of an acute episode and in the management of recurrent ER horses. Understanding the starch intake of the total feed programme and identifying any gaps or shortfalls in the diet will help you create a diet best suited to the individual. Including alternative energy sources in the feeding plan will create more flexibility in the programme, particularly around rest days and ensures appetite is met when hard feed must be reduced. If in doubt as to the contribution of what a feed, forage or supplement is making to your feeding programme, consult your feed provider or nutritionist for further advice.

By Catherine Rudenko

Tying-up or ER (exertional rhabdomyolysis) is a problem that every yard will encounter at some point in time with reports of 5-7% of the thoroughbred population being affected. ER is the general term used to cover two main forms of tying-up, acute or recurrent. ER by definition relates to the breakdown of striated muscle fibres following exercise. These fibres connect to the bone allowing movement of the skeleton. Damage causes anything from mild stiffness to the inability to move.

With much still unknown about the condition, the focus falls on reducing risk and ongoing management of those affected with recurrent form. The main area for intervention and management relates to feeds and feeding practices, an area that can be directly controlled by the yard and adjusted as needed for the individuals most affected.

Acute Exertional Rhabdomyolysis

The acute form is typically caused through factors external to the muscle rather than their being an intrinsic muscle defect.

Most commonly seen when the horse is adapting to a new level of work and the intensity or duration is too strenuous. Where speed work is concerned, the most likely cause is a depletion of cellular high energy phosphates, the muscles’ energy supply, combined with lactic acidosis. Where endurance work is concerned, depletion of intracellular glycogen—the stored form of glucose often combined with over-heating and electrolyte imbalances—is the common cause.

The other key factor for an acute episode is dietary energy intake being excessive to the current level of work. The use of high starch feeds to supply energy for horses in training is a common practice with grains, traditionally oats, forming the basis of such feeds. In the early stages of fitness work, an over-supply of energy relative to need, particularly when starch forms a large part of the diet, is a risk factor.

Recurrent Exertional Rhabdomyolysis

This form of ER, where episodes are frequent and often seen even at low levels of exercise, has led to the suggestion that much like humans, there is an inherited intrinsic muscle defect. Such defects would predispose the horse to ER. Documented defects relevant to thoroughbreds include a disorder in muscle contractility or excitation contraction coupling, whereby muscle fibres become over-sensitive and normal function is disrupted.  

Risk factors for ER in horses with the recurrent form include stress or high excitement during exercise, periods of jogging (10-30 minutes), infrequent exercise and over-feeding of energy in a high starch format relative to need.

Dietary Considerations for ER

The amount of energy fed and the type of energy fed are important considerations whether looking to avoid an acute feed related episode or considering the management of a horse with the recurrent form.

shutterstock_413682127.jpg

Other nutrients often talked about when managing ER include vitamin E, selenium and electrolytes. Historically the inclusion of vitamin E and selenium were considered important for the prevention of further episodes, however there is no evidence to support such use. A case of deficiency in either of these nutrients may well put the horse at a disadvantage and could perhaps create a state where occurrence is more notable; however, with the advent of fortified and balanced complete bagged feeds, such nutrients are normally supplied in more than adequate amounts. Their role as antioxidants which function to ‘mop-up’ damaging free radicals generated through training is where their use can benefit any horse at this level of work. The use of additional vitamin E is also recommended when increasing the fat content of the diet—a common practice when feeding horses with recurrent ER.

Electrolytes do play an important role in normal muscle function, and any deficiency noted in the diet should be corrected. Identifying a need in the diet is more easily done than determining if the individual horse has a problem with absorption or utilisation of the electrolytes. A urinary fractional excretion test (FE) will highlight issues, and subsequent correction through the diet to return the horse to within normal ranges may offer some improvement. However, it is important to note that for horses with recurrent ER, where an intrinsic muscle defect is present, the research to date has shown no electrolyte imbalances or differences between such horses and unaffected horses.

Quantifying ‘Low Starch and High fat’ Feeding

The recommended practice for management of ER is a reduction in starch and an increase in fats. This practice has two ways of benefiting the horse: a reduction in ‘spookiness’ or reactivity and a positive effect on muscle damage as seen by lower CK (creatine kinase) levels following exercise.

Positive effects on lowering CK levels were found when a higher proportion of the energy fed came from diets higher in fats and lower in non-structural carbohydrates (starches and sugars). The effect was noted when fed at 4.5kg/day—an amount easily reached and normally surpassed when feeding horses in training. The beneficial diet provided 20% of energy from fats and only 9% from starches and sugars compared to the more traditional sweet feed diet providing 45% of energy from starches and sugars and less than 5% from fats.

complete feed mix.jpeg

Finding Fats

Top dressing of oils will increase fat in the diet - with a normal intake of up to 100 mls per day. Although the horse can digest higher amounts, palatability usually restricts a higher intake. Pelleted or extruded fat sources are increasingly popular as alternatives to oils for their convenience of feeding and palatability. Straight rice bran and blends of materials such as rice bran, linseed and soya are available from most major feed companies. Oil content will typically range from 18-26% providing 180g-260g of oil per kilogram as fed.  

Racing feeds will also provide oil in the diet; content is quite varied typically from 4-10% providing 40g-100g per kilogram as fed. Hay and haylage also contains oil at a low level, typically 2% providing just 20g per kilogram on a dry matter basis.

Choosing Carbohydrates

Traditional feeding based on oats and other whole grains will have a higher starch content than feeds using a combination of grains and fibres. Levels of starch found in complete feeds and straights have a broad range from as low as 8% in a complete feed, specifically formulated to have a low starch content, and up to in excess of 50% for straights such as barley and naked oats.

TO READ MORE —

BUY THIS ISSUE IN PRINT OR DOWNLOAD

April - June 2019, issue 65 (PRINT)
6.95
Quantity:
Add to Cart

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE?

DON'T MISS OUT AND SUBSCRIBE TO RECEIVE THE NEXT FOUR ISSUES!

Print & Online subscription
24.95 every 12 months

4 x print issue and online subscription to European Trainer & online North American Trainer. Access to all digital back issues of both editions.

Add to Cart

Trainer Profile: Harry Dunlop

Finding Owners

0